skip to Main Content

Best membrane for Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries

A new research paper looks at the membranes used for applications in vanadium redox flow batteries. It outlines various membrane technologies and the obstacles to bringing batteries to mass production.

Scientists from the Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences and the University of Warwick have conducted a review of all existing membranes for vanadium redox flow batteries (VRBs), in a bid to identify the most promising technologies to boost their future development.

The group said that the main barrier for the future of this kind of storage tech is represented by its high capital and maintenance costs, of which the membranes represent a significant portion. But the scientists also noted the technology’s current limited operational lifetime and low conductivity at high current densities as two factors hindering its adoption in mass production.

Commercial perfluorinated polymeric ion-exchange membranes, which are widely used in fuel cells, are currently the most common ones used for VRBs, as they provide for high ion conductivity and stability in the acidic and oxidizing electrolyte solutions.

Nafion, which is produced by U.S. chemical company DuPont, is the most used material for such membranes. But the main barrier for application on an industrial scale is its long-term stability and high price. The scientists described the various modification methods that were applied to make the use of Nafion cheaper.

“By exchanging a part of the Nafion material with cheaper alternatives it is possible to reduce costs,” they said.

They also reported that sulfonated aryl backbone polymers such as SPEEK, SPES, and SPESK were explored as alternatives to Nafion, as they have good thermal and mechanical stability and proton conductivity. However, the latter and their vanadium permeability are lower than those of Nafion.

Anionic exchange membranes (AEM) are considered an interesting alternative to polymeric ion-exchange membranes, due to their reduced vanadium permeability. However, they still show low proton conductivity and poor chemical stability.

“Large research attention goes to improve stability of these groups which can be achieved by modifying the molecular structure of the polymeric membrane,” the researchers said, adding that commercial adoption is still far from being reached.

They are also considering amphoteric ion-exchange membranes (AEIM) in current VRB research, due to their cationic and anionic exchange properties.

Design constraints

The research group listed all current constraints to producing novel membrane chemistries. They include membrane conductivity, stability and resistance, vanadium permeability, preferential water transport, and the morphology of membranes.

All approaches that seek to develop membranes for VRBs should seriously consider three important factors: high conductivity, low vanadium permeability, and high stability, according to academics.

“The ideal membrane should have high ion exchange selectivity, high ion conductivity, low water uptake, low swelling ratio, high conductivity, high chemical, and thermal stability, as well as low cost,” they said.

They described membrane technologies for VRBs in “Membranes for all vanadium redox flow batteries,” which was recently published in the Journal of Energy Storage.

Third-party content in the public domain and is for general information purposes only, with no representation, guarantees of completeness, warranty of any kind, express or implied regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, availability, completeness, usefulness, or timeliness of any information contained within. Please also excuse any syntax as authors and reposted articles are sourced from global origins. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL WE HAVE LIABILITY TO YOU FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY KIND INCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE USE OF THIS REPOSTED ARTICLE. THE USE OF THIS ARTICLE AND YOUR RELIANCE ON ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SOLELY AT YOUR OWN RISK. XRG ALSO ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS IN THE CONTENT OF THIS ARTICLE.


Back To Top