skip to Main Content

Long-duration energy storage makes progress but regulation lags technology

If you were building an electrical grid from scratch (with no regard to regulations or finance), then long-duration energy storage would be requisite. It just makes sense — store energy when it’s cheap and/or abundant, and discharge when the price is high, or the energy is needed by the grid. Use it to load-shift, peak-shift, and smooth; to replace fossil-fuel-fired peaker plants, and to integrate intermittent renewable resources onto the grid.

Long-duration storage fits in with what utilities, independent system operators (ISOs), and regional transmission operators (RTOs) understand. “Most utilities seem to want much longer-duration storage systems, with 6 to 12 hours discharge, to do serious load-shaping over the day,” suggests an analyst at a U.S. energy think tank. Some of these expectations are being driven by the performance of pumped hydro, once the only source of grid-connected storage.

Surely, balancing a photovoltaic- and wind-heavy U.S. grid, while retiring fossil-fueled generators, is going to require long-duration energy storage to deliver power when it’s needed and to absorb curtailed power when it’s not.

Storage booming, lithium-ion dominates

The U.S. energy storage market was booming until the Covid-19 virus hit — and it continues to boom, despite, or because of the pandemic. The U.S. energy storage market is forecast to grow from 523 MW in 2019 to 7.3 GW in 2025, according to energy analyst Wood Mackenzie.

Residential solar installers such as Sunrun have revealed solar-plus-storage attachment rates of up to 15% nationwide and up to 60% in the San Francisco Bay area. Utility-scale developers such as 8minute Solar Energy are coupling energy storage with PV on most, if not all, of their large solar projects.

Today’s energy storage market is absolutely dominated by lithium-ion batteries, but a host of new energy storage technologies are being brought to market — offering longer durations and potential improvements in project economics and functionality.

New technologies (thermal storage, Gravity-, air- and mechanical-based approaches Read Here )

New electrochemistries

Electrochemical energy storage approaches such as flow batteries and some non-lithium battery chemistries boast long-duration capabilities.

Flow batteries circulate a liquid electrolyte through stacks of electrochemical cells and have long held the promise of 10-hour durations, tens of thousands of cycles, minimal degradation, and no limitations on the depth of discharge.

This performance promise has lured venture capital investment and R&D — but so far, the investments have yielded few commercial, competitive flow battery products.

Flow battery firms such as Primus, Invinity, Sumitomo, UET, ESS, and ViZn use a variety of different electrolytes and materials ranging from vanadium to zinc to iron. Installations are increasing but megawatts deployed are tiny compared to lithium-ion.

Form Energy, a secretive startup thought to be developing a flow-battery variant and backed by Bill Gates’ Breakthrough Energy Ventures, has raised over $50 million in funding. Form’s first commercial project is a 1-MW, grid-connected storage system with Minnesota-based utility Great River Energy capable of delivering its rated power continuously for 150 hours, a real achievement if it can be commercialized.

Regulation drives deployment

Grid-scale energy storage was rarely deployed by utilities until it was required by regulators – now it’s rampant in utility RFIs, RFPs, and project awards. Recently, a federal appeals court in Washington D.C. upheld the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s Order 841 — maintaining that FERC has control over energy storage in its regulated interstate markets and energy storage connected at the distribution level must have the option to address wholesale markets.

Storage and long-duration storage technologies are here today – but regulators and utility commissions at the federal and state level are still adjusting.

William Conlon, president of thermal storage startup, Pintail Power offers an example: Long-duration storage technology in California is locked out because of the nature of California’s resource adequacy (RA) requirements. “Four hours is what California wants for RA. If you provide eight hours you only get paid for four hours. We’re at four hours today because that’s what you get paid for.”

Economically viable long-duration energy storage could accelerate solar and wind penetration, grid resiliency and serve to stabilize volatile energy prices. But, long-duration energy storage will not become pervasive until regulators adapt to the capabilities of the technology.

Third-party content in the public domain and is for general information purposes only, with no representation, guarantees of completeness, warranty of any kind, express or implied regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, availability, completeness, usefulness, or timeliness of any information contained within. Please also excuse any syntax as authors and reposted articles are sourced from global origins. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL WE HAVE LIABILITY TO YOU FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY KIND INCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE USE OF THIS REPOSTED ARTICLE. THE USE OF THIS ARTICLE AND YOUR RELIANCE ON ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SOLELY AT YOUR OWN RISK. XRG ALSO ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS IN THE CONTENT OF THIS ARTICLE.


Back To Top